The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
| Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15742 | 2020-03-27 14:31:54 | 132.71 | 98% |
| 13323 | 2018-12-08 22:42:44 | 142.97 | 99% |
| 9327 | 2017-11-18 17:02:25 | 138.51 | 99% |
| 8974 | 2017-11-16 23:48:52 | 157.81 | 99% |
| 4617 | 2017-10-21 21:45:17 | 120.15 | 97% |
| 4488 | 2017-10-21 04:23:37 | 125.78 | 98% |
| 4015 | 2017-10-19 14:46:23 | 134.09 | 98% |
| 2266 | 2017-07-23 17:30:00 | 136.79 | 98% |
| 1916 | 2017-07-20 16:30:30 | 141.91 | 98% |
| 499 | 2017-07-09 17:05:36 | 136.20 | 97% |
| 123 | 2017-07-07 23:59:31 | 141.17 | 98% |