The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
37034 | 2020-11-15 08:32:49 | 89.58 | 96% |
33464 | 2020-09-22 08:13:22 | 94.18 | 98% |
30455 | 2020-08-13 01:14:21 | 91.80 | 98% |
29260 | 2020-07-20 10:22:19 | 101.10 | 98% |
26789 | 2020-06-12 23:27:19 | 92.13 | 97% |
23137 | 2020-02-06 09:30:33 | 81.94 | 96% |
18621 | 2019-07-06 15:40:37 | 79.14 | 95% |
18224 | 2019-06-23 02:55:29 | 90.48 | 97% |
17268 | 2019-06-04 16:14:42 | 88.06 | 97% |
16463 | 2019-05-23 12:54:25 | 88.48 | 97% |
16026 | 2019-05-15 05:06:41 | 84.14 | 97% |
13923 | 2019-03-27 15:48:47 | 78.63 | 96% |
10605 | 2019-02-16 10:23:05 | 77.22 | 97% |
3965 | 2018-09-15 20:30:36 | 62.36 | 95% |
2394 | 2018-04-26 15:16:13 | 61.80 | 96% |