The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
55890 | 2020-07-20 00:18:57 | 131.79 | 98% |
49566 | 2020-06-20 00:28:39 | 135.19 | 97% |
32606 | 2020-03-19 11:47:07 | 67.35 | 96% |
25300 | 2019-12-28 15:30:49 | 103.49 | 98% |
18608 | 2019-10-20 11:16:24 | 129.16 | 98% |
16180 | 2019-09-08 07:09:28 | 96.85 | 98% |
14030 | 2019-08-17 03:48:05 | 99.26 | 96% |
12756 | 2019-08-03 08:06:31 | 104.56 | 96% |
8589 | 2019-05-19 05:30:03 | 85.24 | 97% |
8025 | 2019-05-05 12:21:06 | 113.67 | 96% |