Black holes are one of only a fairly small number of cases in the history of science in which a theory was developed in great detail as a mathematical model before there was any evidence from observations that it was correct. Indeed, this used to be the main argument of opponents of black holes: how could one believe in objects for which the only evidence was calculations based on the dubious theory of general relativity?
—from A Brief History of Time, a book by Stephen Hawking
Active since February 3, 2019.
425 total characters in this text.
View Pit Stop page for this text
| Rank | Username | WPM | Accuracy | Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | (sidd_) | 163.99 | 99% | 2019-02-03 |
| 2. | Cameron (gnikgg) | 143.70 | 97% | 2019-02-03 |
| 3. | Jon (jlachney) | 140.44 | 97% | 2019-02-03 |
| 4. | Hreyfill Hreyfill (hreyfill) | 139.58 | 99% | 2019-02-03 |
| 5. | Vielle (arc_sec) | 133.92 | 97% | 2019-02-03 |
| 6. | Jonathan (bazookajojo) | 108.66 | 98% | 2019-02-03 |
| Universe | Races | Average WPM | First Race |
|---|---|---|---|
| o4do0q2x8u | 6 | 138.38 | February 3, 2019 |