The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
64078 | 2020-07-27 21:00:18 | 116.06 | 98% |
61956 | 2020-04-01 16:14:58 | 123.18 | 98% |
61433 | 2020-03-24 23:18:02 | 101.92 | 97% |
57987 | 2019-10-18 19:53:57 | 106.62 | 97% |
54847 | 2019-08-15 01:08:01 | 93.69 | 96% |
39469 | 2018-11-29 23:52:28 | 97.41 | 97% |
35845 | 2018-10-19 20:52:49 | 104.34 | 98% |
34541 | 2018-10-06 19:01:41 | 109.27 | 98% |
24520 | 2018-05-23 02:13:48 | 101.61 | 97% |
24228 | 2018-05-15 17:53:12 | 107.72 | 98% |
24206 | 2018-05-15 01:26:03 | 94.82 | 96% |
20817 | 2018-03-30 21:17:47 | 102.23 | 98% |
19766 | 2018-03-20 00:33:30 | 96.36 | 97% |
18049 | 2018-02-27 01:04:20 | 105.12 | 99% |
9823 | 2017-09-02 21:41:13 | 98.86 | 98% |
8217 | 2017-07-20 19:00:57 | 101.35 | 97% |
5495 | 2017-05-31 23:32:30 | 94.96 | 94% |
3833 | 2017-05-03 22:00:26 | 87.75 | 91% |