The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
25457 | 2018-04-25 11:00:06 | 114.42 | 97% |
21742 | 2018-03-09 12:43:39 | 109.46 | 97% |
16395 | 2018-01-19 14:06:30 | 121.39 | 99% |
16394 | 2018-01-19 14:02:01 | 113.57 | 98% |
11222 | 2017-11-12 22:15:12 | 99.50 | 97% |
8568 | 2017-10-25 14:34:41 | 115.84 | 98% |
8567 | 2017-10-25 14:32:49 | 127.78 | 99% |
7354 | 2017-10-03 17:54:18 | 115.02 | 98% |
6719 | 2017-09-14 18:08:22 | 122.77 | 98% |
6224 | 2017-08-31 12:51:48 | 116.16 | 99% |
4302 | 2017-07-24 12:59:52 | 106.35 | 97% |