The view that machines cannot give rise to surprises is due, I believe, to a fallacy to which philosophers and mathematicians are particularly subject. This is the assumption that as soon as a fact is presented to a mind all consequences of that fact spring into the mind simultaneously with it. It is a very useful assumption under many circumstances, but one too easily forgets that it is false. A natural consequence of doing so is that one then assumes that there is no virtue in the mere working out of consequences from data and general principles.
Game | Time | WPM | Accuracy |
---|---|---|---|
82914 | 2020-12-11 19:22:09 | 85.81 | 96% |
78816 | 2020-11-11 16:16:26 | 92.58 | 96% |
76604 | 2020-10-25 08:27:46 | 80.36 | 96% |
63734 | 2019-11-25 19:51:24 | 95.21 | 97% |
56085 | 2019-05-31 18:10:02 | 102.92 | 98% |
45559 | 2018-12-25 20:15:09 | 91.75 | 96% |
41623 | 2018-11-15 21:30:18 | 93.62 | 97% |
41412 | 2018-11-14 11:25:53 | 97.30 | 96% |
39640 | 2018-11-02 10:14:42 | 88.69 | 96% |
33844 | 2018-09-21 02:08:19 | 85.23 | 96% |
18908 | 2018-05-07 21:01:08 | 79.61 | 96% |
15718 | 2018-04-13 00:00:24 | 91.29 | 98% |
14520 | 2018-04-05 11:20:45 | 87.95 | 96% |
13209 | 2018-03-28 20:57:14 | 85.14 | 97% |
3240 | 2017-08-06 23:02:54 | 66.14 | 96% |
802 | 2017-07-29 06:35:58 | 61.89 | 96% |